Correspondence Chess as Scientific Contest

This post considers why Correspondence Chess is thought as the scientific side of chess, while Over-The-Board Chess the sportive side of the game, and Chess Problems its artistic side.

Over-The-Board Chess is considered a sport since players fight in matches in which they rely on their memory, physical and mental strength, while Chess Problems explore the qualities and relations of the board and pieces in themselves to illustrate their characteristics and beauty.

Correspondence Chess seeks to apply and prove the game’s truths and laws aided by all support possible including computers, databases, encyclopedias, etc. Correspondence games are thus thought by some to provide a higher level of quality, as they avoid blunders and apply all resources available to the games.

This scientific nature of Correspondence Chess has been part of the game since its beginnings in the early 19th Century. For the famous planned match between Paris and London in 1824, arguably at the origin of modern Correspondence Chess, there was a press announcements in the news stating that:

“Amateurs, no doubt, will be gratified in witnessing this scientific contest, which will display the skill of, probably the first players in Europe” Tim Harding. Correspondence Chess in Britain and Ireland. 1824-1987. McFarland and Company, 2011. Page 9.

As this early announcement at the origin of Correspondence Chess shows, its scientific nature has always been perceived as an integral part of the game. Today, references to Correspondence play as scientific continue in the midst of questions about its reliance on technology.

Correspondence players today need to keep studying chess and generating knowledge through the games played. By engaging in this type of scientific contest we will continue to bring unparalleled insight into chess.

Nicolas Ronderos

Nicolas Ronderos is an American ICCF Player. He is also a Good Companion Fellow at the US Chess Problem Society. He lives in Paris and tweets about CC as @CorrChess
  1. admin left a comment on May 31, 2020 at 9:11 am

    I think this is an excellent term to describe correspondence chess, a scientific contest. Much more objective than the term centaur chess, a parallel to the mythical creature, in this case part OTB and part computer chess player.

  2. Leonardo Simal Moreira left a comment on June 1, 2020 at 2:10 pm

    Correspondence Chess is the Scientific Chess.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.